What brand of melon machine is good? 2024 Popular Excavator Brand Competition
Recently, with the continuous development of the infrastructure industry, the market demand for excavators has continued to heat up. As a representative model of medium and large excavators, 360 excavators have become the first choice for many engineering projects. So, which brand of 360 excavator is good? This article will combine the search popularity, user reviews and professional data on the entire network for the past 10 days to bring you Zhenhai analysis.
1. Ranking of the popularity of mainstream 360 excavator brands in the entire network
| Ranking | brand | Search index | Positive and negative evaluation ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sany Heavy Industry | 58,742 | 4.2:1 |
| 2 | XCMG | 49,856 | 3.8:1 |
| 3 | Caterpillar | 42,369 | 4.5:1 |
| 4 | Komatsu | 38,452 | 3.9:1 |
| 5 | Doushan | 32,147 | 3.5:1 |
2. Comparison of core parameters of 360 excavator
| Brand model | Engine power (kW) | Standard bucket capacity (m³) | Working weight (kg) | Price range (10,000) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sany SY365H | 212 | 1.6 | 36,500 | 120-135 |
| XCMG XE370TH | 220 | 1.65 | 37,200 | 125-140 |
| Carter 349 | 228 | 1.8 | 38,600 | 150-170 |
| Komatsu PC360-11 | 206 | 1.58 | 36,800 | 145-160 |
3. Check labour users are most concerned about the five major purchasing factors
According to the latest research data of the Engineering Machinery Forum, the factors that users pay most attention to when purchasing a 360 excavator are:
1.Fuel consumption performance- Sany Heavy Industry SY365H has the advantage with an average fuel consumption of 12.5L/h
2.<宅斗>720 degree after-sales service system- XCMG leads with 96% service outlet coverage
3.Operating comfort- Caterpillar's cab ergonomics score reaches 4.8/5
4.Data acquisition system- Komatsu's intelligent management system support reaches industry-leading
5.Second-hand mobile phone residual value rate- Doosan's value retention rate stabilizes at 65-70% after 3 years
_group>4. Expert advice
Experts from the Engineering Machinery Association pointed out that the selection of a 360 excavator should consider the site conditions:
1.Mining operationsCaterpillar or Komatsu, its heavy-duty design is more durable
2.Municipal EngineeringIt is recommended to choose XCMG or Sany, which has a higher overall cost-effectiveness.
3.Leasing shot blasting operationDoosan's mid-to-low-end models have obvious cost advantages
Worth > 5. Purchase suggestions
Looking at the factors in general, for most domestic users, Sany Cu Engineering and XCMG 360C are relatively cost-effective choices. For high-end users of budget ler, Caterpillar 349 is still a quality benchmark. It is recommended that consumers go to the local dealer for test drive comparison based on actual working conditions and budget before making a decision.
Note: The data statistics cycle is from March 1 to March 10, 2024, and the data sources include authoritative channels such as Baidu Index, Engineering Machinery Forum, PAC Excavator Sales Ranking.
check the details
check the details
en
